tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-246218792024-03-07T02:36:48.089-06:00Chi-Sox Blog<img src="http://static.flickr.com/56/153046444_c530d5e48e.jpg?v=0" alt="Example" />Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.comBlogger653125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-13622979613284558562008-02-12T03:17:00.000-06:002008-02-12T03:19:27.676-06:00We Have a New Home!In case anyone stumbles across this site or you still are subscribing to the feed, here's a headsup letting you know that we have moved.<br /><br />Our new home is <a href="http://lifeinthecell.com/">Life in the Cell</a>. In case you adverse to hyperlinks, here's the address spelled out: <a href="http://www.lifeinthecell.com/">www.lifeinthecell.com</a><br /><br />We've condensed down from our SweetHomeSports empire to a cozy Sox dedicated blog again. So please, come on by and don't forget to update your bookmarks/RSS feedsJeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-58947393064818106902007-06-06T21:53:00.000-05:002007-06-06T21:57:39.525-05:00Hello RSS ReadersI noticed there are still a number of people getting the feed here at CSB, so I just wanted to make doubly sure that you guys know that I moved on to a different site; I didn't just disappear. As I said in my<a href="http://chisoxblog.blogspot.com/2007/01/big-news-for-csb.html"> last post</a> with the help of James and DT Kelly we've expanded into an all Chicago Sports site called <a href="http://www.sweethomesports.com">Sweet Home Sports</a>. We currently have a healthy stable of writers and have the <a href="http://www.sweethomesports.com/sox">Sox,</a> <a href="http://www.sweethomesports.com/bulls">Bulls</a>, <a href="http://www.sweethomesports.com/bears">Bears</a>, and <a href="http://www.sweethomesports.com/cubs">Cubs</a> site running. We're still looking for writers to write about the Blackhawks and the Fire; if you're interested drop me an e-mail (<a href="mailto:chisoxblog@yahoo.com">chisoxblog@yahoo.com</a>).<br /><br />Hopefully you guys find your way over to <a href="http://www.sweethomesports.com">Sweet Home Sports</a> and <a href="http://www.sweethomesports.com/sox">Life in the Cell,</a> our Sox' page.<br /><br />Cheers,<br />JeevesJeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1169628421107781872007-01-24T02:40:00.000-06:002007-01-24T20:57:55.843-06:00Big News for CSBHey hey folks, big news over here at Chi-Sox Blog.<br /><br />We're moving on to bigger and better things.<br /><br />I've teamed up with James and DT Kelly to form <a href="http://www.sweethomesports.com">Sweet Home Sports</a>. It's a blog dedicated to all Chicago sports. Our master plan is to have a stable of writers for each Chicago team (Sox, Bulls, Bears, Cubs, Fire, Blackhawks) that can essentially do what we do here at CSB but for their respective team. Each blog is hosted out of our main site, <a href="http://www.sweethomesports.com">Sweet Home Sports</a>, as well as a separate blog where we'll comment on other things that happen in the sports world.<br /><br />So please come check it out; if you're looking for Sox news, check out <a href="http://www.sweethomesports.com/sox">Life in the Cell</a>, which will be the new home to the page as well as Pander and DickdaStick (once I get them plugged in).<br /><br />Also, if you're interested in joining us and filling one of the writing positions, drop me an e-mail (<a href="mailto:chisoxblog@yahoo.com">chisoxblog@yahoo.com</a>), and we'll see what we can work out; just keep in mind, it is not a paid position, but rather a labor of love.<br /><br />Cheers,<br />JeevesJeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1169018472354329072007-01-17T00:44:00.000-06:002007-01-17T01:21:12.426-06:00Transactions, Transactions, Transactions...Well, Only Two ReallyWave goodbye to Chris Stewart. KW traded him to his favorite trading partner (the Texas Rangers) for minor leaguer John Lujan. Lujan fits the recent mold of pitchers that Kenny has acquired; great arm, suspect control/mechanics. Lujan can reach upwards of 97 mph with his fastball. Odds are the Sox were looking at him earlier for the B-Mac trade, so he may be a guy that the Sox' Organization likes. He pitched in high-A ball, so don't look for him to reach the bigs anytime soon.<br /><br />I will admit Stewart was a good defensive backstop, but outside of that he didn't really bring much to the table. With the addition of Toby Hall (thank God), Stewart didn't really have a place on the team. He would have been shuffled off to the minors and eventually would have run out of options. It's a good move by Kenny to flip an unecessary player for someone who could eventually make an impact.<br /><br />In the minors, that leaves Gustavo Molina as the emergency catcher if AJ or Toby go down. Molina is pretty good with the glove, and he can't be much worse with the bat than Stewart, so for the third catcher spot, it isn't much of a downgrade.<br /><br />One thing of note is that the trade of Stewart opens up a spot on the 40-man roster. Does that mean a trade is forthcoming? I don't know; only Kenny does, but hopefully that means some outfield help is on the way.<br /><br />----------------------------------------------------<br /><br />The Sox also signed Joe Crede to a very frugal, one-year, $4.94 million contract. By signing Crede, the Sox avoided arbitration and seem to have saved a decent chunk of change. I figured Crede would get around $6 million or so, considering Boras was looking to get him $8 million.<br /><br />Odds are Crede will be gone after next season or the year after, but avoiding the arbitration process is a plus if the Sox do have any intention on re-signing Crede long term. It's best not to drag your future players through the mud.<br /><br />So rest assured Chicago, you man-crush is back for another season...I hope.Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1168849847844299662007-01-15T02:19:00.000-06:002007-01-15T02:30:47.920-06:00DA BEARS!Here are the quick hit thoughts from my beer-addled mind.<br /><br />-First Bears' playoff win I've ever seen, and if was fantastic. I'm for sure heading to O'Hara's again next week to watch the NFC Championship.<br /><br />-Rex was pretty decent. He wasn't great, and by no means was he terrible. Once he learns to accept a sack, he'll be golden. I don't blame him for his pick, Moose should have caught that ball. The one thing Rex needs to work on for next week is making sure to lead his receivers more; there were a few drops by receivers on balls that were behind them. The receivers should have caught them, but Rex should make things easier on them.<br /><br />-Speaking of golden, that's what Robbie Gould's right foot is made of. One thing I think should be pointed out is the fact that in Madden '07, Gould is not listed as our kicker.<br /><br />-Rashied Davis: Breakout game.<br /><br />-I'm so happy, I can't even tell you.<br /><br />-Way to have cojones Lovie; we were begging him to go for it on 4th and 1, and thank God he did.<br /><br />-I think, I think (yes I think, I think) that Cedric Benson is better than Thomas Jones, but TJ showed so much heart and intensity today. On both his TD's he went nuts, and I think the whole team should have his passion.<br /><br />-Devin Hester has the same problem as Rex Grossman, maddening inconsistency. He kept dropping the ball, but then for that glorious 15 second span, we all thought he returned one for 6 (until of course it was called back on a penalty). Someone out there, was that a fair call or not? Was that penalty called on Ricky Manning Jr. or someone else?<br /><br />-Ricky Manning Junior just makes plays. People tohught we overpayed for a nickelback, but it was worth it.<br /><br />-Didn't hear Nathan Vasher's name once today, but maybe that's a good thing because we didn't hear Deion Branch's name all that much either.<br /><br />-ROBBIE GOULD!<br /><br />-I'm all done for now; check back later, I may add some thoughts as they roll through my mind.Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1168507209385168662007-01-11T02:02:00.000-06:002007-01-13T23:32:45.910-06:00Kenny Williams: A Beane or a Krause? -- Part 3The two major trades of this off-season for the Sox have been those involving their starting pitchers, and it's these two trades that really started the comparisons to Beane and Krause in my mind.<br /><br />I'll start with the most recent, the McCarthy trade for Danks and Masset. I'm optimistic about the trade, as I so often am when Kenny makes a move, but I can't help but seeing the terrors of trades past, namely one made by Jerry Krause. I don't think it will turn out poorly, but the truly unbiased part of me can't help but see McCarthy as Elton Brand and Danks as Tyson Chandler.<br /><br />All us Bulls' fans know that Krause saw the upside of Chandler and decided that he potentially <em>could</em> (but didn't) have become a far more impactful player than Brand (who was averaging 20-10), so he pulled the trigger on the ill-fated trade. Likewise, Kenny sees more potential in Danks (as many scouts do). The difference I suppose in Kenny's situation, is that this trade isn't going to make or break the franchise as it did for the Bulls. he did get the added benefit of Nick Masset. Also, I trust Kenny more than I trust Krause, because at that point in his (Krause) career, he was desperate to put together a championship caliber team that had his stamp all over it.<br /><br />The Garcia trade, on the other hand, reminded me instantly of Beane, and more specifically the Tim Hudson trade and the Mark Mulder trade; it reminded me of Beane on two accounts. First, the pure logistics of the trade, established started with one-year left on his contract for good, young pitching. Hudson was traded for Charles Thomas (an OF) and starters Dan Meyer and Juan Cruz, Mulder was traded for Danny Haren, Kiko Calero, and catcher Daric Brown, while Freddy was traded for starters Gio Gonzalez and Gavin Floyd. I realize the Hudson trade doesn't look spectacular in hindsight; Cruz is starting for the D-Backs and Meyer and Thomas are in AAA (although Meyer could join the rotation), but that's not all that surprising. There is a reason young players in the minors are called prospects; it's because their futures <em>look</em> bright, but by no means does that guarentee success. I'm hoping and am confident that the Sox' trade will work out better and look more like the Mulder trade, but it's impossible to say at this point and it's a moot point. KW, like Beane, knew that it was better to jettison his pitcher while he had value, rather than let him walk away for nothing during free agency.<br /><br />The second part of this trade that reminded me of Beane, is a little more obscure, but has the potential for a far reaching impact. In <u>Moneyball</u>, Michael Lewis tries to shed some light on Beane's keys to success; the thing that gets lost in translation is that Beane's aim was and continues to be to identify undervalued skillsets and acquire players that have such skills. A lot of people assume <u>Moneyball</u> is merely about players with high OBP, but that's just one of the skills (getting on base) that Beane felt was undervalued on the market at that time. Due to the undervaluation, players with high OBP, but say limited power or base-stealing ability were there for the signing/drafting at a vastly discounted price. Since OBP is now a hot stat in the Bigs (thanks in part to Beane), he is undoubtedly looking elsewhere to try and exploit the market.<br /><br />So how does this relate to Kenny? Well, in my eyes, he's doing the same thing. In today's market, veteran starting pitchers and even veteran relief pitchers are way over priced. (Gil Meche for $55 million, anyone?) The reason for the overvaluation is two-fold; there is a shortage of good starting pitching out there (a whole different post, in itself, that I'll get to soon) and teams are suddenly flush with money due to revenue sharing, increased gate receipts, et al. As Beane looked for players with an undervalued skillset, Kenny set out to acquire <em>young, cheap</em> pitching talent. Many of the teams that sought to plug holes in their rotation relied on old, expensive pitchers; as we've all seen, Kenny went in the opposite direction, and he should be applauded for it. He has taken necessary steps to try and preserve this club's future while also strengthening the '07 ball club at a dirt cheap price.<br /><br />The truly impressive thing about it all, is that Kenny horded young pitching talent. He didn't just pick up a one or two players; this off-season he has acquired John Danks, Nick Masset, Jacob Rasner, Andrew Sisco, Gio Gonzalez, Gavin Floyd, David Aardsma, and Carlos Vazquez. If your eyes just glazed over, that's 8 pitchers. The reason I think this is so impressive and important is because of the volatility of prospects and relievers. As I said before, you never know if a prospect will match his potential, but while each prospect's career is independent of eachother, the thought of two prospects failing is far more unlikely than just one prospect flaming out. By acquiring a number of prospects, Kenny is insulating the team from the strong possibility of a prospect not panning out.<br /><br />The place that Kenny stands out the most is the way he's dealt with the bullpen. Quick, name the highest paid reliever on the team...Mike Macdougal? Good, now, how much does he make? He's due to be paid $1.5 million (after making $0.43 million last year). Every other reliever is making somewhere in the neighborhood of $300,000. This to me is smart business sense. Consistently good relievers are pretty rare in this game. For every Mariano Rivera and K-Rod (note, that those are closers, I struggled to think of a middle reliver off the top of my head) you get a Kyle Farnesworth, a Cliff Politte, or a Neal Cotts. Relievers are up and down, volatile as I said. When you pay bottom dollar for your 'pen, if one pitcher is unproductive, he can just be dumped; had he been making $3 million a year, a GM would have to think twice about dumping him. The beauty of it, is that the bullpen isn't a bunch of low-rent dregs; Kenny has established a stable of good, hard-throwing relievers that have a legitimate chance to be one of the best units in the game. I laugh when I see pitchers like Joe Borowsky and Ryan Dempster make $4 million a year. The Sox pen as a whole will make somthing like $6 million.<br /><br />I realize I'm giving Kenny a lot of credit for what he's done, but he's by no means the only GM to take such measures. Beane has been doing it for a while now and ironically enough Brian Cashman of the Yankees is following a similar plan as seen by his trades of Sheffield and Johnson. I find it ironic that the Yankees are looking for cheap pitching, when they are most responsible for the game's current financial landscape.<br /><br />I think many GM's in the league are waiting with bated breath to see if Kenny's gambles pan out. If he does succeed and secures the Sox' future as championship contenders for the next handful of years or dare I dream it, an Atlanta like run of a decade plus, I'm sure GM's will suddenly start valuing their cheap starters more. They'll try follow Kenny's model, much as GM's followed Beane's model the past few years.Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1168399483596615292007-01-09T20:50:00.000-06:002007-01-09T22:48:59.326-06:00Quick Hits on the BCS Title GameI know everyone in the world has already said their bit about the championship, but I consider myself an avid college football fan, so here's my quick hit thoughts on the game.<br /><br /><em>Troy Smith got owned</em><br /><br /><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/2335/2555/1600/123072/Smith%20goes%20down.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/2335/2555/320/621182/Smith%20goes%20down.jpg" border="0" /></a><br />Everytime he dropped back to pass, I was worried he was going to get sacked (yes, I was cheering against Florida). Even when he was in the shotgun, he had trouble getting off solid passes.<br />Give a lot of credit to Florida's line for that. The Gators didn't have to do a lot of fancy blitzes, because their ends had no problem running by the offensive line.<br /><br /><em>Good-bye smashmouth OSU football?</em><br /><br />OSU has long been known for smashmouth, run the ball up the gut, style football, but they completely abandoned the running game yesterday. Antonio Pittman had only 10 carries; naturally you would assume he had so few carries because he couldn't run the ball effectively. The funny thing is he averaged 6.2 ypc. OSU tried airing the ball out too much at the start, and once they fell behind they forgot the running game.<br /><br /><em>Zone defense against an accurate passer = gross.</em><br /><br />The Buckeyes refused to get out of a zone scheme and Chris Leak absolutely picked apart the secondary. He gashed the defense for 6 and 7 yard passes and OSU was helpless to stop him.<br /><br /><em>Injuries can hurt</em>.<br /><br />If Teddy Ginn played the whole game, he no doubt would have made an impact, but it wouldn't have been enough. Unless they decided to put him on the line to block Harvey, and then put a headset on him and have him call a non-zone defense, then maybe, he could have won the game for the Buckeyes.<br /><br /><em>Where was Tressel</em>?<br /><em></em><br />Senor Sweater Vest was pretty much absent from this game. The only memorable move he made was that 4th-1 call on the OSU 29 yard line. I actually liked that move, but I didn't like the play they called. I fully expected Tressel to change tactics and light a fire under his team in the second half, but there was no such change.<br /><br /><em>Big ups and respecc to Florida</em>.<br /><br />They played a complete game. Their defense was early-season Bears-esque, the special teams was solid, as was the offense. They totally earned the win, but I still feel like OSU is the better team, maybe it's my Big Ten bias, but I felt like this game was the perfect storm for Florida. They just happened to have their best game (again, props for that) in the championship, while OSU had by and large their worst game.<br /><br /><em>Love for the kicker.</em><br /><br />Florida kicker, Chris Heltand was 4-13 on the season and had the world's shortest leash coming into the game, but he came through with two 40+ yard field goals.<br /><br /><em>The most fitting half-time show ever.</em><br /><br /><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/2335/2555/1600/128639/Titanic%20sinking.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/2335/2555/320/743670/Titanic%20sinking.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Did anyone notice that the OSU band played "My Heart Will Go On" during the break? I'd say that was the most fitting song, for the occasion. The OSU juggernaut was taking on water at that point and completely sunk in the second half.<br /><br />I wonder if the band director had two songs for the band to perform. The Titanic one if the Buckeyes were losing and a different song if they were winning or at least in the game.Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1168319574570646542007-01-08T23:05:00.000-06:002007-01-08T23:12:54.576-06:00HousekeepingSorry for the hiatus, I realize these are my first three posts of the New Year. I didn't mean to go so long between posts, but Winter Break sort of disrupted my blogging pattern (namely writing when I should be doing homework). Rest assured, I'll be back in full force by the weekend. I can't make promises with regards to this week, but odds are I'll be posting prety regularly again.<br /><br />Look forward to my take on the best pitcher's of all-time. It'll be similar to my analysis of the <a href="http://chisoxblog.blogspot.com/2006_11_01_chisoxblog_archive.html">best hitters</a>, where I won't provide a definitive answer so much as I will provide some tools to compare pitchers from different eras.<br /><br />--------------------------------------------------------<br /><br />Also, welcome to D.T. Kelly, the newest writer at CSB! D.T. for awhile ran his own sports blog, and was a frequent commentor on this site. He's recently started the blog, the <a href="http://whitesox.wordpress.com/">Exploding Pinwheel</a>, so between here and his site, you should hear plenty from DT.<br /><br />--------------------------------------------------------<br /><br />A Belated Happy New Year to you all! My resolution is to have the White Sox win another World Series.Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1168318940475129792007-01-08T22:42:00.000-06:002007-01-08T23:02:20.743-06:00Crede's Glove Gets Some LoveLee Panas over at <a href="www.detroittigertales.blogspot.com">Tiger Tales</a>, has recently taken a look into fielding metrics. He took a look at various different measures, but due to small inefficiencies in each, he took the average rankings from various metrics to come out with his "average fielding rank." I'm glad to say that his <a href="http://detroittigertales.blogspot.com/2007/01/aggregation-of-fielding-measures.html">ranking of 3B</a> looks favorably upon our very own Joe Clutch. He's also got up a ranking for SS, and I'm sure the rest are to follow soon.Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1168317686174826482007-01-08T21:02:00.000-06:002007-01-08T23:04:35.603-06:00Kenny Williams: A Beane or a Krause? -- Part 2I scrounged up most of the trades that the Sox have made during the Kenny Williams era, just to see whether they can afford us any insight into his more recent trades. I also went ahead, and grouped them into categories; feel free to tell me where you think I went wrong with the categories.<br /><br /><strong>Heists</strong><br /><br />1/15/2003 Acquired pitcher Bartolo Colon and infielder Jorge Nunoz from Montreal in exchange for pitchers Rocky Biddle and Orlando Hernandez, outfielder Jeff Liefer and cash considerations<br /><br />6/27/2004 Acquired RHP Freddy Garcia, C Ben Davis and cash considerations from Seattle in exchange for C Miguel Olivo, minor league OF Jeremy Reed and minor league INF Michael Morse.<br /><br />7/31/2004 Acquired RHP Jose Contreras and cash considerations from the New York Yankees for RHP Esteban Loaiza.<br /><br />3/8/2006 Acquired INF Alex Cintron from the Arizona Diamondbacks in exchange for RHP Jeff Bajenaru.<br /><br />3/20/2006 Acquired LHP Matt Thornton from the Seattle Mariners in exchange for OF Joe Borchard.<br /><br /><strong>Good Pulls</strong><br /><br />6/29/2001 Alan Embree, LHP, was acquired from San Francisco in exchange for Derek Hasselhoff, RHP<br /><br />1/15/2003 Acquired pitcher Orlando Hernandez and cash considerations from the New York Yankees in exchange for pitcher Antonio Osuna and minor-league pitcher Delvis Lantigua.<br /><br />7/1/2003 Acquired outfielder Carl Everett from Texas in exchange for frank francisco, josh rupe, and anthony webster<br /><br />7/29/2003 Obtained LHP Scott Schoeneweis and minor league RHP Doug Nickle from the Angels for RHPs Gary Glover and Scott Dunn and LHP Tim Bittner.<br /><br />12/2/2003 Acquired infielder Juan Uribe from the Colorado Rockies in exchange for infielder Aaron Miles.<br /><br />11/25/2005 Acquired 1B Jim Thome and cash considerations from the Phillies for CF Aaron Rowand, LHP Dan Haigwood and LHP Gio Gonzalez<br /><br />12/13/2005 Acquired INF Rob Mackowiak from the Pittsburgh Pirates in exchange for LHP Damaso Marte..<br /><br />6/15/2006 Acquired RHP David Riske from the Boston Red Sox in exchange for LHP Javier Lopez;<br /><br />7/24/2006 Acquired RHP Mike MacDougal from the Kansas City Royals in exchange for nonroster LHP Tyler Lumsden and nonroster RHP Daniel Cortes<br /><br /><strong>Winner by a nose</strong><br /><br />1/14/2001 Acquired pitchers David Wells and Matt DeWitt from the Toronto Blue Jays for pitchers Mike Sirotka, Kevin Beirne and Mike Williams and outfielder Brian Simmons<br /><br />7/13/2002 Acquired 3B D''Angelo Jimenez from San Diego for catcher Humberto Quintero and outfielder Alex Fernandez<br /><br />7/29/2002 Traded catcher Sandy Alomar to Colorado for RHP Enemencio Pacheco.<br /><br />2/13/2005 Acquired minor league OF Jerry Owens from Washington in exchange for OF Alex Escobar.<br /><br /><strong>More or Less Even<br /></strong><br />7/26/2001 James Baldwin, RHP, was traded to Los Angeles for minor leaguers Onan Masaoka, Gary Majewski and Jeff Barry.<br /><br />7/31/2002 Traded RHP Bobby Howry to Boston in exchange for RHP Franklin Francisco and LHP Byeong An.<br /><br />12/21/2001 Acquired OF Scott Bikowski and IF Josh Shaffer from the Anaheim Angels for P Dan Mozingo and P Jim Sweeney in a deal of minor league players.<br /><br />3/27/2004 Acquired OF Timo Perez from the New York Mets in exchange for RHP Matt Ginter.<br /><br />6/17/2004 Traded RHP Billy Koch and cash considerations to the Florida Marlins for minor league SS Wilson Valdez.<br /><br />7/18/2004 Acquired OF Carl Everett and cash considerations from Montreal in exchange for minor league RHP Jon Rauch and RHP Gary Majewski.<br /><br />7/31/2005 Acquired INF Geoff Blum from the San Diego Padres in exchange for LHP Ryan Meaux;<br /><br /><strong>Minimally bad<br /></strong><br />7/1/2003 Acquired second baseman Roberto Alomar and cash considerations from the New York Mets in exchange for minor league pitchers Edwin Almonte and Royce Ring and infielder Andrew Salvo.<br /><br />7/23/2006 Acquired C Sandy Alomar Jr. from the Dodgers in exchange for RHP B.J. LaMura<br /><br /><strong>Poor Trade</strong><br /><br />7/25/2002 Traded 2B Ray Durham to Oakland for RHP Jon Adkins<br /><br />7/28/2002 Traded OF Kenny Lofton to San Francisco for RHP Felix Diaz and LHP Ryan Meaux.<br /><br />8/5/2004 Acquired 2B Roberto Alomar from the Diamondbacks for cash and a player to be named.<br /><br /><strong>(Non-Magic) Beans for a Cow<br /></strong><br />12/13/2001 Acquired RHP Todd Ritchie and C Lee Evans from the Pittsburgh Pirates for RHP Sean Lowe, RHP Kip Wells and RHP Josh Fogg.<br /><br />12/3/2002 Acquired closer Billy Koch, Neal Cotts and outfielder Daylan Holt from Oakland in exchange for pitcher Keith Foulke, catcher Mark Johnson, minor league pitcher Joe Valentine and cash considerations.<br /><br /><strong>Can't judge</strong><br /><br />12/13/2004 Acquired OF Scott Podsednik, RHP Luis Vizcaino and a player to be named from Milwaukee in exchange for OF Carlos Lee.<br /><br /><em>-We got the short end when it comes to raw talent, but Pods helped catalyze the '05 World Series run; I highly doubt we would have won a title without him, so I can't really judge this one. Plus as James mentioned, it freed up a lot of cash for the likes of JD.<br /></em><br />12/20/2005 Acquired RHP Javier Vazquez and cash considerations from the Arizona Diamondbacks in exchange for RHP Orlando Hernandez, RHP Luis Vizcaino and OF Chris Young.<br /><br /><em>-Too soon to tell. If you believe Coop fixed Javy down the stretch (keep in mind for starters, it usually takes him longer) then this trade isn't so terrible. If you believe Javy is a bust then this is a poor trade.</em><br /><em></em><br />I'd venture to say that Kenny has been more consistent with his trades as of late. His two albatrosses were in '01 and '02 and the results of all his good trades can be seen with the culmination of the '05 title. That probably bodes well for his recent slew of trades, unless you're the pessimistic sort and figure he's long overdue for a terrible trade.<br /><br />Unfortunately (for the sake of analysis) Kenny hasn't made a trade for a prospect, where he also dealt a prospect, so we have no prior experience to jump off of. In general he <em>has </em>been good when he's dealt prospects. The Vazquez trade notwithstanding, Gio Gonzalez seems to be the best prospect to be shipped off, and the Sox got him back. Frank Francisco had a good shot at being something, but the chair throwing coupled with Tommy John Surgery stopped his career in its tracks.<br /><br />Kenny and his staff seem to know his players pretty well. Jeremy Reed was acknowledged as the Sox best prospect and he was the minor leaguer of the year in '03, yet KW flipped him and a few others for Freddy Garcia. There were definitely split feelings over the trade, but the Sox made out like filthy bandits in the end.<br /><br />Another big problem that plagued Kenny early on was trading with teams from the Bay Area, but that isn't a concern with these moves. (Ahhhh, the sarcasm)<br /><br />This somewhat became and exercise in futility, looking at all these trades. They weren't as relevant as I hoped they would be, but it's interesting enough to look at. Although all this should definitely be taken with a huge grain of salt, I will say that recent history looks encouraging.<br /><br />-----------------------------------------------------------<br /><br />I just want to bring up this question, see what y'all think...<br />Kenny has done a good job restocking the minors with arms, but what do you think is going to happen with regards to the minors and positional players? We don't have any studs in the minors outside of Sweeney and Fields, and some would even argue that they aren't studs. The Sox have no legitimate infield help in the upper leagues. Do you think Kenny will start pawning off some older players for position prospects or will he look to pick some up in the draft? Any creative trades you can think of that would net the Sox some talent without sabotaging the '07 team?<br /><br />-----------------------------------------------------------<br /><br />Coming soon in the Kenny series...<br /><br />-I'll outline his free-agent signings in a similar fashion. For not other reason than because I think it will be interesting to look at as a whole.<br /><br />-A final comparison of Kenny to Billy Beane. I'll compare some of the Sox trades (recent trades and potential trades) to similar ones made by Beane.Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1167384367087412902006-12-29T03:20:00.000-06:002006-12-29T03:26:07.156-06:00Kenny Williams: A Beane or a Krause? -- Part 1To be honest, Kenny Williams reputation as a world class GM has taken a serious hit this off-season, especially in Chicago; the media, particularly, has been mercilessly ripping him ever since the Garcia trade. Going into the 2006 season, the prevailing thought (at least among Sox fans) was that Kenny was a genius. He created a World Series caliber team, capable of competing for <em>another</em> title; he may have slipped up with the Vazquez/Chris Young trade, but it was at least justifiable (with the chance of being a savvy trade) and a far cry from the disaster that was the Todd Ritchie trade.<br /><br /> It’s incredible to see so much of the media and so many fans, for that matter, forsake the fact the Sox won the ’05 title and the fact that the Sox had back-to-back 90-win seasons for the first time since ’65. Usually there’s a three-year grace period or so, after a championship, where the GM and the coach are relatively safe from being torn apart by the fans and the media, but apparently Kenny won’t be afforded that immunity.<br /><br />Perhaps it’s due to our nature, as Chicago sports fans, to assume the worst and fear all is lost, that has led so many to lose confidence in Kenny. <a href="http://chisoxblog.blogspot.com/2006/12/thoughts-on-07-and-beyond-defending.html">I haven’t given up my faith yet</a>; I still feel he is undoubtedly one of the best GM’s in the majors. I agree that his moves were ballsy and risky, but I see the direction he’s trying to take and I can see his reasoning. It’s possible that I’m underestimating the radical-ness of Kenny’s moves and this season could very well end up being his downfall, but only time will tell; at this time and point, I’m willing to give KW the benefit of the doubt. He did after all help get the Sox into the position where fans could make legitimate gripes that he’s scuttling a shot at the ’07 championship in favor of taking multiple shots down the road. I’d much rather have those gripes than debating whether the Sox will finish second or third in the division.<br /><br />As I got to thinking about Kenny, his recent moves reminded me of two other GM’s in particular. One is lauded by many as the best GM in baseball, an innovative GM who has changed the way people analyze baseball. The other constructed the supporting cast to create one of the greatest basketball dynasties of all time, but was later disgraced in the eyes of fans as he sought to create another dynasty, this time from the ground up, and gambled the team’s future on signing free agents and later a risky trade. I’m speaking of course of Billy Beane of the Oakland A’s and Jerry Krause formerly of the Chicago Bulls.<br /><br />Like KW, both of Beane and Krause got their start as scouts. I think this is at least partially responsible for why Beane and Krause are usually such keen evaluators of talent. While all three have made their mistakes (more on Kenny’s in later parts of this series), you cannot argue the fact they possess an eye for talent. Having such an eye for talent helped both Beane and Krause establish a team that could consistently win. When Krause stepped into the GM position, he already had Michael Jordan, but he was able to twice craft a team around MJ that would win three straight championships. That’s no small feat; thanks to his acquisitions of Scottie Pippen, Horace Grant, Bill Cartwright, Ron Harper, Toni Kukoc, Dennis Rodman, etc. he brought Chicago 6 championships, with the high point being the 72-win squad. Likewise, since Beane took over the A’s, Oakland has averaged 89 wins a season, while maintaining a super, tight budget. Although, Beane hasn’t won a championship, he’s hardly the one to be at fault, you can thank the “All-American Crapshoot” that is the MLB playoffs for that.<br /><br />After runs of extended success, both Beane and Krause were faced with the prospect of overhauling their roster. Although neither move was technically, absolutely, 100% necessary, the terms at the time dictated that both Krause and Beane had to try and take a step forward for the good of their respective teams. Budget constraints forced Beane to surprisingly break up the “Big 3”, while the impending retirements of Phil Jackson and MJ as well as some bad blood with remaining players forced Krause to go into complete rebuilding mode. This is the point where the careers of Krause and Beane really start to deviate.<br /><br />Krause sought free agency as the fix for the Bulls’ problems, and keyed in on freeing up cap space for the ballyhooed free agent crop of 2000 featuring the likes of Tim Duncan, Grant Hill, and Tracy McGrady. As we all know this plan failed miserable as Krause and the Bulls were spurned by even lower rung free agents like Tim Thomas and Eddie Jones. This led to the 2001 draft day disaster where Krause traded Elton Brand for Tyson Chandler. By most accounts, Chandler had a higher upside than Brand, and Krause banked on Chandler reaching said ceiling (keep this in mind for when the <a href="http://chisoxblog.blogspot.com/2006/12/white-elephant-gift-or-not.html">Brandon McCarthy trade </a>is brought up, later on). Krause envisioned having Chandler and Eddy Curry team up and lead the Bulls to another period of dominance. His plan and his risk never took to fruition and eventually led to his resignation.<br /><br />Beane, on the other hand, had a much more successful turn around, especially considering his team never had to sink as low as the Bulls did. After missing the playoffs for the first time in 4-years and realizing that budget constraints would cause the A’s to lose some of their star pitchers to free agency, Beane took the iniative to trade <em>both</em> Tim Hudson and Mark Mulder, 2/3 of the Big 3. There was talk at the time of Beane trading one of the three, but it came as a shock to many that he ended up trading two of them. Beane essentially sacrificed a few wins in 2005 (a year where they did not make the playoffs but remained very competitive) to ensure that his team would get some value in return and would not be sunk by the departure of Mulder and Hudson via free agency. (Keep this in mind when the <a href="http://chisoxblog.blogspot.com/2006/12/sox-finally-make-deal.html">Freddy Garcia trade </a>is brought up, later on, as well as the thought of trading Mark Buehrle).<br /><br />In my eyes, the stories of Beane’s and Krause’s career follow a similar arch until they diverge greatly at the end. They established winning organizations, and are faced with trying to secure continued success in the near future. Kenny is currently saddled with a similar situation. The Sox lose Javier Vazquez, Mark Buehrle, Jermaine Dye, and Tadahito Iguchi after ’07 and Jon Garland and AJ Pierzynski after ’08. Kenny could forsake the future and go broke for a championship in ’07, or try and preserve the Sox chances for winning a title now, while maximizing the team’s chances for prolonged success. In the coming years, we’ll get to see first hand whether Kenny’s methodology was a success or not. We’ll get to see if he’ll be a Krause or a Beane. Perhaps most importantly for baseball, we’ll get to see if Kenny’s plan of building around young, cheap pitchers (as Beane also did) takes hold, because that could cause a paradigm shift in the manner that teams build their rotations. We all know where I stand, but here’s hoping, again, that Kenny turns out to be a Beane.<br /><br /><em>In coming parts, I’ll compare Kenny’s recent trades to moves made by Krause and Beane and examine both the similarities and the departures to the moves and what that means to the future. Also, I’ll take a look at some of Kenny’s more noteworthy trades from over the years to see whether it affords Sox fans reasons to be optimistic or pessimistic about these recent changes.</em>Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1167336243304144412006-12-28T13:55:00.000-06:002006-12-28T14:04:03.420-06:00Pass the Ci(n)tronWe've re-upped with <a href="http://chicago.whitesox.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/article.jsp?ymd=20061227&content_id=1767952&vkey=news_cws&fext=.jsp&c_id=cws">Alex Cintron</a>. It's a pretty good deal for the Sox; they signed him to a 1-year $1.9 million contract. He's a useful back-up considering the number of positions he can play, and he can hold his own at the plate.<br /><br />I'm still working on the Kenny piece as we speak, so check out<a href="http://soxmachine.com/blogs/soxmachine/archive/2006/12/27/2219.aspx"> Jim's ranking </a>of the top-40 individual season's in White Sox history; it'll help put JD's great season into perspective.Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1167287429705159242006-12-28T00:29:00.000-06:002006-12-28T00:30:29.793-06:00Coming SoonI'm working on a two or three part series about Kenny Williams. It should be pretty interesting; I hope to have part one up by tomorow evening, so keep an eye out for that.Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1167028647730234802006-12-25T00:36:00.000-06:002006-12-25T00:37:27.793-06:00And A Happy Jesus' Birthday to you...Merry Christmas everyone!<br /><br />From everyone here at Chi-Sox Blog, I hope you have a great and safe Christmas!Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1166978654882756592006-12-24T09:29:00.000-06:002006-12-24T13:40:34.106-06:00A White Elephant Gift or Not?As I'm sure everyone has heard, the White Sox traded Brandon McCarthy and Rookie baller David Paisano to the Rangers for lefty John Danks and righties Nick Masset and Jacob Rasner.<br /><br />Here's some background on the main players involved, before we take a look at the deal from the Sox side.<br /><br />Over his career (151 innings), B-Mac has posted a 4.41 ERA and a 1.25 WHIP. Ever since his success down the stretch in 2005, he has been groomed to enter the Sox rotation. With the surplus of starters last year, though, he was relegated to the bullpen where he showed <a href="http://soxmachine.com/blogs/soxmachine/archive/2006/09/28/1709.aspx">flashes of brilliance </a>but seemed to struggle in such an ill-suited role. His career numbers only show part of the story. As a starter in 12 starts, he's 4-3 with a 4.16 ERA and a 1.15 WHIP, while often looking dominant. The two biggest knocks on B-Mac is his HR/9 rate and his apparent lack of potential. His HR/9 is 1.71 which is really high even when factoring in that he pitched at homer friendly, US Cellular Field. Because of that and other reasons, most people have Black Mac projected at best, as a third starter; I've heard a few comparisons to Eric Milton because of the homer rate. After seeing McCarthy, I'd say he could easily be a solid number 2 starter, but that's yet to be seen. McCarthy sports a sharp curve and a really good change. His fastball isn't overpowering in the low 90's, but with the threat of his change it's effective. He struggles when he leaves his fastball up and when he leans to heavily upon his change.<br /><br />Danks on the other hand, still hasn't cracked the majors. If you take his stats at face value, it doesn't look like he's torn up the minors, but if you take a closer look, he's been pretty impressive. The most important thing to notice is that he's 21 years old, so he's consistently been among the youngest players in his league. Last year, he split time at AA and AAA and showed a knack for adjusting to his competition. He started out the year at AA Frisco and proceeded to post a 7.15 ERA for the month. After that he went 4-0 with a 2.70 ERA in his next eight starts before getting promoted to AAA Oklahoma. In his first 8 starts, he struggled posting a 5.90 ERA, but rebounded in his last 6 with a 2.32 ERA. If you take away his April and his first 8 starts in AAA, he looks really, really good. Danks has three plus pitches. His best pitch is his 1-7 curve. After getting drafted he also has added a good change, which he has developed extensively. He has been coached to not avoid throwing his curve too much, so that he doesn't hurt his arm. This tactic has expediated the development of his change. His fastball like McCarthy isn't particularly overpowering. He can get it up to 94 MPH. He added a 2-seamer last year, but I don't know much about its effectiveness.<br /><br />Masset reminds me of Floyd in the sense that he has great stuff, but just hasn't made it big yet. He had Tommy John surgery his senior year, but recovered nicely from it. He has been up and down in the minors. In 8 starts at Frisco, he had a 2-2 record with a 2.06 ERA. At AAA, he made 7 starts and 17 appearances as a reliever. I can't find his splits anywhere, so I'm unsure as to wheter he struggled as a starter and was made a reliever or if it was the other way around or what. All I can definitively say is he had a 4.81 ERA and 1 complete game. He's been the closer for his Winter Ball team and been dominant, posting a 2.81 ERA with 15 saves.<br /><br />As a Sox fan I'm torn over the trade. There are parts of me that like it and parts of me that hate it. I read one article and I'm happy about the trade, I read something else and I'm disgusted by it. I think I'm leaning toward liking this deal, but here's a negtive <em>and</em> a positive look at it.<br /><br /><em><a href="http://fleecethepigflogthepony.blogspot.com/2006/12/part-2-of-grandmaster-kenny-williams.html">Kenny = Jerry Krause</a> = A fool for young talent</em><br /><br />Kenny has sabataged the '07 squad in favor of trying to strengthen future teams. He has taken a team with the potential to win a World Series and effectively scuttled any hope. Last year the Sox had 6 good starters, now there are 4! The Sox strength was their surplus of pitching and now they have a deficit. We've all seen during this free agency period how nearly all teams are pitching hungry, which is how the likes of Gil Meche gets $55 mil. The only acceptable trade of McCarthy would be for an established pitching star. We need him or someone of comparable talent in the rotation. The whole reason the Sox were able to get rid of one of their starters was that they were able to plug McCarthy right into the rotation without seeing a drop off. Who's going to step in now? We're going to see the ridiculous 02-04 years all over again when the Sox couldn't buy a win out of the fifth spot in the rotation. Unless the Sox go to a 4-man rotation, they're going to be in a bunch of trouble.<br /><br />What's the point in building so much for the future, when a championship is within reach <em>this</em> season. Kenny did well to strengthen the bullpen which was the big issue last season. Getting Toby Hall was a nice addition too, but the starting rotation, aside from jettisoning one pitcher, wasn't an issue. Scott Podsednik and to a slightly lesser extent Brian Anderson should have been priority number one after fixing the 'pen. Instead, the fifth starter is now the most glaring hole, a hole that didn't exist prior to this week.<br /><br />Not only did Kenny sabotage the rotation, but he traded a sure thing for an <em>un</em>sure thing. By many account, Danks is a lefty version of McCarthy with simliar, albeit slightly better stuff. Danks has never pitched in the bigs; McCarthy has and has dominated at times as a starter. It's not as though Danks has torn up the minors, indicating that he'd make an easy transistion to the bigs.<br /><br />Apparently, Kenny doesn't want to risk paying big bucks in free agency the next few years so he's mortgaged the team's immediate future.<br /><br /><em>Kenny = genius</em><br /><em></em><br />My most account Danks is a yonger, lefty version of McCarthy with better stuff. Why wouldn't Kenny want to do this deal? Even straight up, the Sox would be getting a better pitcher. Danks has the potential to be a number 1 pitcher or a number 2 at best; Black Mac has been projected at best to be a 2, but more likely to be a number 3 or 4. There's a good chance he could even step up and fill the role of 5th starter. Last year, Baseball America thought he could very well get called up in '06 and pitch for the Rangers, but Texas wanted to bring him along slowly to protect his arm, so he remained in the minors. If the Sox want to bring him along slowly as well, they still have Haegar or Floyd to fill that 5th starter role.<br /><br />Some people are pointing to the fact that Danks has struggled in the minors as a minus, but it's a positive when looked at carfully. He has merely taken time to adjust to the competition; once he's adjusted, he's been dominant. McCarthy wasn't all that dominant either. At AAA in '05 he had a 3.92 ERA, not bad but not lights out.<br /><br />It's impressive that Kenny was able to commandeer Masset as well. He's another fireballer to put in the bullpen or another arm that could be worked on in the minors to become a starter. As long as Don Coop is around, the Sox are bound to have some of these arms pan out, and considering the amount of potential these two guys have as well as the others, the Sox are bound to have some stud pitchers.<br /><br />The Sox also have the pieces to make an attractive offer for a good, young outfielder. Maybe they'll be able to pry loose Baldelli or Crawford from Tampa now.<br /><br />There will be more coming on my views of Kenny's master plan. Keep your eyes peeled.<br /><br /><strong>Edit: I keep reading about some issues of uncoachability with regards to McCarthy. Apparently it was brought up on the radio, and because of this Cooper "wasn't ready to assure him a spot in the rotation." This may have hastened this trade a bit.</strong><br /><strong>Also, I realize it doesn't completely come out in the post, but I'm kinda on the fence about the trade, but I'm leaning toward liking it.</strong>Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1166917628650226162006-12-23T17:45:00.000-06:002006-12-23T17:47:08.716-06:00B-Mac Traded to the RangersYes, I've heard (and yes I've come out of my unplanned winter break hibernation); I'm doing som research so I can put out a good post with minimal bias.Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1166389273810614502006-12-17T14:50:00.000-06:002006-12-17T15:01:17.463-06:00KW Gives Sox Fans an Early Christmas PresentWe can officially put to rest the Sandy Alomar rumors! Finally, we have a back-up catcher, and thank goodness, it's a legitimate back-up! I think of all KW's moves this season, this one has made me the happiest. Seriously, if AJ were to go down with no legit back-up, the Sox would have been sunk; Sandy or Stewart behing the plate would not cut it.<br /><br />We also needed a back-up that could effectively spell AJ every now and then, especially against lefties. We all saw how AJ struggled during the close of the season, as he tired. AJ only hit .228 and .280 in August and September. I think we'll see Toby against most lefties; over his career AJ has hit .248 against lefties, while Hall has hit them to the tune of a .274 average, with a .297 average over the past 3 years.<br /><br />This is a great signing by Kenny, and I'm thoroughly pleased. I'm especially happy, because he's signed for more than one year. I figured Kenny would talk Hall into signing for one-year to raise his status for free agency next year, but instead the Sox are paying him $3.65 million for two years, with a club option for $2.25 million.<br /><br />Now if only we can find a suitable left fielder.Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1166309194160909412006-12-16T16:45:00.000-06:002006-12-17T14:50:36.016-06:00Ross Gload Has Been FreedJames' wish has finally been granted, although not quite in the manner he meant. For a while, his rallying cry was "Free Ross Gload," in reference to freeing hm off from the bench, but good ol' Gload was freed completely from an organization that underestimated his ability to contribute to the team.<br /><br />Gload was traded to the Royals for Andrew Sisco. Sisco is a big, big lefty to say the least, 6-9, 250; add a mullet and you've got a thicker Randy Johnson (at least in body type). He had a very good rookie season, two years ago, posting a 3.11 ERA in 67 games with 76 K's, but struggled last year. In 65 games, he had a 7.10 ERA and saw his K's drop down to 52.<br /><br />Sisco still has options left, and Kenny Williams says he's going to talk to Sisco about whether he (Sisco) wants to make it as a reliever or a starter. So unless Boone Logan is terrible in spring training, I figure Sisco will start in the minors.<br /><br />Sisco has pretty good stuff from what I remember; a good mid 90's fastball and a so-so changeup and a curve. From what I've been hearing, he's had some control problems, so you can add him to the list of players that Coop is going to fix this season. It's quite the laundry list with Floyd, Gio, Sisco, Vazquez, Boone, The Count, and Buehrle (if he needs fixing).<br /><br />So farewell Gload! You served us well; no Sox fan will forget how you hit .321 in 110 games in '04. Seeing how loaded KC is at first base, maybe we'll reaquire you later on in the season.Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1166207585801095292006-12-15T12:32:00.000-06:002006-12-15T12:35:07.303-06:00It's Friday, so you know what that means......time for another <a href="http://dahumber.blogspot.com/2006/12/friday-five_15.html">Friday Five</a>, care of DA Humber! Yours truly takes part in the weekly discussion for the second time. So go check it out.Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1166134681077354062006-12-14T16:13:00.000-06:002006-12-14T16:18:01.146-06:00It's Thursday, so you know what that means......that's right, I'm going to be participating in <a href="http://dahumber.blogspot.com/2006/11/friday-five_17.html">DA Humber's Friday Five</a> again! So come Friday, I recommend you go check it out. Hell, go check out the <a href="http://www.dahumber.blogspot.com">site</a> now too, while you're at itl DA does some good stuff.Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1165977944065792472006-12-12T20:08:00.000-06:002006-12-13T14:38:24.650-06:00Time to See the Real Freddy AduOk, apologies for the gratutious pun. I felt obliged to make a pun since I avoided the obvious Adu/adieu pun. Anyway...<br /><br />As most of you <em>haven't</em> heard; DC United has shipped off Freddy Adu to Real Salt Lake. DC United gets a few bits and pieces, most notably the "major player allocation", but that's not the interesting thing about all of this.<br /><br />I am a soccer fan, but I'm not going to say I'm big on the MLS. Frankly, it's much more boring than the international game, and I even have a hard time watching the Fire sometime. (If you're at a game, that's a whole different story; I looove going for Fire games.) This deal has me genuinely excited for the upcoming season. I'm curious, just as many are, whether or not Freddy Adu is really that good. There of course have been flashes of greatness, but no runs of prolonged genius.<br /><br />A bulk of the blame for this can be blamed on Adu's former situation. DC was stacked at the attacking midfield position, which is Adu's preferred position. So instead, Adu was played at right mid-field. This position did not suit him as he has had difficulty with crossing with his right foot since he is a lefty. The other problem with his position is that DC playes with only three defenders across their back line, which forced Freddy to back track and play a lot more defense.<br /><br />Real Salt Lake offers him a great opportunity. He'll be playing under his former U-17 National Team coach, so he'll likely be given the keys to the car, and will be featured at attacking mid. Just the trust situation between Freddy and his coach, I think, will boost his game a bunch. At times Adu looked restrained while playing; it looked like he would avoid riskier plays because of the fear of upsetting his Peter Nowak (his former coach, who he didn't get along with). That situation reminded me of Ben Gordon and Scott Skiles. Skiles at tiems has the quickest hook imaginable with Benny G.; one small mistake can result in a benching for him. Now that Freddy is with a coach he in on good terms with, he can play more freely and instinctively without having the fear of getting benched in the back of his mind.<br /><br />Looking at the big picture, I don't think his performance in Utah is going to make or break his prospects of playing in Europe. I'd peg that more on his performance in the upcoming U-20 World Cup. Assuming the US qualifies, it will be his third such tourney, and it will pit him against the world's best and brightest prospects. If he dazzles there, or even just performs well, he will draw pretty heavy interest from European clubs.<br /><br />This trade affords Freddy the chance to finally show the masses (at least in the States) what he can do. It won't necessarily make or break his chances in Europe, but it will go a long way to determining his star power in the US.Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1165966134989013762006-12-12T17:07:00.000-06:002006-12-12T18:59:44.876-06:00Dippin' Into the Asian Market<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/2335/2555/1600/428533/po-yu%20line.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/2335/2555/320/300154/po-yu%20line.jpg" border="0" /></a><br />This is slightly old news, but it hasn't gotten much press. I was going to write about it earlier, but I've been in search of more info on this topic.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.taiwanbaseball.blogspot.com">Taiwan Baseball</a> posted that the White Sox signed 20 year-old Po-Yu Lin out of Taiwan with a sign on bonus of about $300,000. That isn't a huge bonus, but it is a pretty sizable amount. According to Ben at Taiwan Baseball, Lin was considered the ace of the staff during the 2004 World Junior Championships. He's also gained extra experience playing for the Anchorage Bucs in the ABL; in 6 games he had a 3.03 ERA. Here's a clip of him pitching<br /><br /><br /><br /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SNS-BmN35fs" width="425" height="350" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent"></embed><br /><br />His breaking ball seems to have some pretty good movement on it. Reportedly he can reach the low 90's, and if he progresses like most young minor leaguers, I expect to see him add a couple MPH to his fastball.<br /><br />For the most part he's an unknown commodity; I guess we'll have to wait until Spring Training to find out what we have on our hands.<br /><br />Unfortunately, Ben from Taiwan Baseball isn't all that high on him. I e-mailed him, and this is what he said,<br />"Regarding Lin, the guy he is most comparable to is Blue Jays farmhand Po-Hsuan Keng. Based on their physical build and stuff-wise, these 2 are near carbon copies of each other. Lin can top out at 92 mph, but throws comfortably in the high 80's. With stuff like that, I can't imagine Lin being a starter in the Bigs unless he develops pinpoint control. So, we'll see if the Sox eventually convert Lin into a reliever like the Blue Jays have done with Keng. Physically, I think Lin has plateaud. He definitely does not have the ceiling of let's say a Tsao, Kuo, or Chien-Ming Wang."<br /><br />Just for reference sake, in 32 games and 70 innings as a reliever with the Class A Lansing Lugnuts, Keng posted a 2.33 ERA with a 10:3 K:BB ratioand only 4 homers.<br /><br /><em>Kudos to The Cheat for the pic and the video.</em>Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1165955584004220262006-12-12T14:31:00.000-06:002006-12-12T19:11:39.106-06:00Barry Bonds SightingJust thought I should point out that today at around 7:30 AM on my way to my math final, I passed Barry Bonds. What he was doing on the UCLA campus I have no idea. I wish I would have asked for an autograph, just to see if the media's portrayal of him as an asshole is true, but unfortunately I was too shocked and I didn't feel like bothering the guy.<br /><br />Oh yes, his head is bigger in person.Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1165823299495843692006-12-11T00:44:00.000-06:002006-12-12T00:07:09.873-06:00The Bears Have the Best Defense, Period.(As Fornelli pointed out, I forgot to address the Bears' injuries; even without Mike Brown, the Bears have been the best defense this season. It's tough to say what the Tommie Harris situation will end up looking like; so, I'm saying on the whole this season, the Bears have been the best defense.)<br /><br />I'm sick and tired of people saying team X has a better defense than the Bears. It's an exercise in futility. The latest wannabe ascendors to the Bears' throne are the Boys from Dallas, whom were championed by Sean Salisbury.<br />Salisbury said on SportsCenter Tuesday night that the Cowboys are, right now, the best team in the NFC. The 'Boys are playing a more complete game of football recently. But Salisbury went on to say that <strong>the Dallas defense is better than the Bears'.</strong><br /><br />Ok, it's one thing to say currently the Cowboys are the best team in the NFC; I don't think they are, but I'm not going to find fault with that, because it was defensible. Of course, Salisbury had to go ahead and stick his foot up his ass by saying that the Dallas D is better than the Bears'.<br /><br />I waited 5 long days for Sunday to come, just so I could see the Cowboys exposed and Salisbury made to look like an even bigger idiot. So let's take a quick peak at the Dallas vs. New Orleans tilt, with regards to the defense.<br /><br />The first thing a defense needs to do is prevent points, obviously. Let's look at the scoreboard, oh yes, 42 points for the Saints. Now, there sometimes can be <a href="http://chisoxblog.blogspot.com/2006/11/rumblings-on-turnovers-and-dolphins.html">extenuating circumstances</a>. If your offense continually turns the ball over, giving your opponent a short field, even the best defense can be left helpless. Let's see, pick number 1 by Romo was returned to the Dallas 39, and pick number 2 was in the endzone, so you can't cut the defense any slack there. All those points were on the D.<br /><br />Just taking a cursory glance at their past games, the Cowboys have had games where they've given up 24, 38, and 36 points. Hardly stellar performances.<br /><br />One of the other criteria for a great defense, is a defense that forces a ton of turnovers. In this game Dallas had only one TO, and that was Terrell Owens. The defense had nary a pick nor a fumble recovery. On the season, the D has forced 26 turnovers. The Bears by comparison have 21 picks alone, to go with 18 FR, for 39 total Turnovers.<br /><br />Also, on the game, Brees threw for 384 yards with 5 TD; Reggie Bush had 125 yards receiving; and Deuce had 111 yards rushing. This defense has certainly put the D in Dallas.<br /><br />Some past poseurs...<br /><br />The Denver Broncos - Early in the season, they were being compared to the '85 Bears (as all defenses, great and not so great) are. In their last game, they gave up 48 points to the Chargers, and have given 34 and 35 points in earlier games. '85 Bears, you better watch out, someone may knock you off your perch as best D ever...NOT (God bless Borat)<br /><br />The Jacksonville Jaguars - They've had games of 36 and 3 games of 27. NEXT<br /><br />The Chargers? Not so much - Games of 30, 41, and 27 with a 21, 24 and 25 mixed in.<br /><br />The Baltimore Ravens - Not bad. Their high games have been 26, 20 and 22. I'd put them as second behind the Bears. They do lead the league in TO margin, but it's misleading because their offense masks the fact they only forced 28 TOs, again compared to the Bears 39.<br /><br />DA Bears - They have a high game of 31, which as we all know, <a href="http://chisoxblog.blogspot.com/2006/11/rumblings-on-turnovers-and-dolphins.html">is not the D's fault</a>. When your offense gives up a pick 6, a fumble on the 6, and a pick to inside the 20, you can't fault the D; that's 21 points right there. Besides that, the highest game was 23 (thanks to 6 TO's by the O against the Cards), 2o points, and 17.<br /><br />I don't want to hear any more teams touted as the best D in the league, unless their name starts with a B-, and ends with an -ears. If you asked a coach or a player from any team, which D would you least like to face, they would respond Da Bears. The only way they could get anymore intimidating would be if they started doing the haka.<br /><br /><br /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PdkjujgYqZ4" width="425" height="350" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent"></embed><br /><br />Some background on the Haka - The Haka originally was a dance done by the Maoris, the native people of New Zealand, to psyche themselves up before battle. About a hundred years ago, the New Zealand national sports teams (I think the All Blacks may have been the first) started doing the Haka before all sproting events. Other polynesian countries have their own war dances, the Tongans have their own, as do the Fijians, for examples. I bet Palomalu knows his native war dance.<br />The clip above shows a new version of the Haka that the rugby team made themselves a few years ago. The clip below as the traditional version that was actually done by the Maoris. I've seen the Haka in person, and can honestly say it is the most intimidating thing I have ever seen. Each time I've seen it, it has given me the chills.<br /><br /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zPXtS9neg0Y" width="425" height="350" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent"></embed><br /><br /><br />In the second clip, France looks just about ready to surrender the game and their country.<br /><br />Imagine Urlacher leading the Bears in the Haka, the other teams would shit themselves with fear.<br /><br /><strong>UPDATE - As I'm watching the game, I'm gearing myself up to eat some nice crow.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>UPDATE - I'm not disappointed with this performance. They Bears made adjustments in the second half, and only gave up more points once the game was in hand. At the end of the game they were in the prevent defense, and we all know <a href="http://chisoxblog.blogspot.com/2006/10/lets-just-shoot-ourselves-in-foot.html">my thoughts on that</a>.</strong>Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com7tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24621879.post-1165641324679889192006-12-08T23:07:00.000-06:002006-12-09T03:10:37.463-06:00This is How We Do: Welcome!I think the past couple days have brought the greatest influx of readers ever to Chi-Sox Blog, thank you Deadspin! The past two days alone we've seen over 1,500 visitiors and 2,000 page views, which made me realize we have a whole bunch of new readers out there. So to those of you unfamiliar with the site welcome!<br /><br />Chi-Sox Blog started has solely a White Sox blog to chronicle what I thought was going to be the a World Series winning season. Over the season the writing style has evolved and picked up from more objective to more of a fan's perspective; also, along the way I picked up DickDaStick, James, and Pander who help contribute. After the season ended though, I realized I couldn't sit by and wait for Spring Training to hit, so I just up and started blogging about all things sports. So again, to those of you who are new here, welcome, and feel free to drop a comment, positive or negative or whatever.Jeeveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12291323538650621896noreply@blogger.com2